• Features
  • Reviews
  • Teaching
  • Watch & Listen
  • About

The past is never dead. It's not even past

Not Even Past

Massive Data and Digital History: Teaching with Mark Ravina

In Spring 2020, Professor Mark Ravina introduced a new variant on the highly successful, HIS 320W • Thinking Like A Historian. He describes the course as follows:

Historians use a range of analytical skills and our discipline, like the rest of the world, is entering the age of big data. In this class we will explore changes in American society using a massive data source, the hundreds of millions of names in the Social Security database. We will treat changes in baby names as evidence of broader political, social, and cultural change. When and why did the name Adolph drop in popularity? That should be obvious, but which name dropped in popularity the fastest: Adolph, Benito, or Hillary? Which name switched genders the fastest: Ashleigh, Kerry, or Jackie? Have personal names in the US become more or less diverse? Do the answers to these questions vary by state or region? Is Texas more “name diverse” than Wisconsin? Through these questions, we will explore the intersection of history with the interdisciplinary field of data science.

So that we can analyze name trends, this course will introduce the computer language R and review some basic algebra. Math and coding-related questions will include how to measure name diversity and how to calculate it by state and year. We will also explore more conventional historical sources and methods: newspapers, magazines, fiction and non-fiction books, and archival materials. Which politicians, celebrities, or fictional characters might have changed the popularity of a name? Was the name Marion, for example, already trending female when Marion Robert Morrison chose the screen name John Wayne? Did Cassius Clay spark a trend toward Islamic and Afro-centric names when he became Muhammed Ali? How do biographies, autobiographies, and other sources explain trends in names? How do those explanation match our quantitative evidence?

You do not need any special background in mathematics or computer science, just curiosity and a lack of “math anxiety.” If you have a strong math, stats, or coding background, you will learn to apply those skills to real world data. If not, this is a great introduction to data science. For all students, by combining humanistic critical thinking with computational analysis, this course will give you skills applicable to a range of careers.

This article highlights three innovative student projects that emerged out of this exciting new course.

William Kovach

In the following excerpt, William Kovach discusses his first name’s popularity, and the various forces that impacted it. The project was focused on identifying how a name, in this case William, can serve as a lens through which to investigate US History more broadly.

The below graph shows the yearly change of the name William’s popularity, which has steadily decreased since 1880.

The name’s fall has been gradual and consistent, so similarly gradual forces—namely increasing name diversity, urbanization, and globalization—have likely contributed to it. Data demonstrate significant negative correlation between these phenomena and William’s popularity, and scholarly articles suggest that the forces may be causal.

Nicknames of William have seen greater volatility than the name itself. This fact can be linked to characters and individuals known by the names in popular culture. Billy’s popularity, for example, rose considerably leading up to the 1930s. Bill was also popular during the period. Characters including Buffalo Bill, Billy the Kid, Wild Bill Hickok, and Broncho Billy were popularized in association with depictions of the United States’ “Wild West,” and many of them were growing in popularity leading up to and during the early 1900s. This suggests that they may have influenced the nicknames’ popularity in the same period and the following one. The graph below shows the frequency of each of those character names in American English literature (from Google ngrams).

Liam Monahan

In the following excerpt, Liam Monahan discusses his given name and how it has grown in popularity following the rise to fame of certain actors.

Baby names in the U.S. are deeply entrenched in popular culture. Liam, for example, was propelled on the wings of fame to become the U.S.’s most popular baby name in 2018. The name’s popularity soared from the depths of anonymity to the heights of conformist endorsements, all thanks to the 1993 movie Schindler’s List and its star, Liam Neeson. After the initial spike, the name surged while a successive chain of celebrity Liams supported its popularity. After achieving mainstream usage, Liam shed its Irish heritage and has expanded to become common in Hispanic, Black and Asian populations in New York state. Ultimately, Liam’s popularity proliferated throughout the US, including Puerto Rico, and spread abroad to Canada, France, the UK, Spain and Switzerland.

Liam’s rise in popularity is connected chiefly to the Academy Award winning film, Schindler’s List. In fact, Liam and Oskar (with a Germanic “k”) both soared after the film. According to The New York Times, Liam Neeson played the protagonist Oskar Schindler with “mesmerizing authority” and “unmistakably larger than life, with the panache of an old-time movie star” (“Review/Film: Schindler’s List; Imagining the Holocaust to Remember It – The New York Times.” Accessed March 28, 2020 https://www.nytimes.com/1993/12/15/movies/review-film-schindler-s-list-imagining-the-holocaust-to-remember-it.html). This relatively obscure name – uniquely spelled with a Germanic “k” and not Anglicized “c” – surged in popularity in 1993, corresponding with the release of Schindler’s List and in parallel with the spike in the name Liam. Oskar rose from near anonymity to 0.0013% in 1993 and finally 0.0073% in 2018, a 462% increase. Oskar increased amongst boy baby names from 1993 until 2009, jumping 444%. Notably there was no similar rise in the related and more common name Oscar, spelled with a “c,” which subsequently diminished in popularity.

Patrick Smith

Patrick Smith examines his first name and its connection with religion and demographics.

“Patrick” has historically been a popular male name in the United States. Its popularity peaked in 1968, when it was given to 0.751% of male babies born (Social Security Administration 2020). The name has steadily declined in popularity since and was given to only 0.117% of male infants born in 2018, (Social Security Administration 2020). (See Figure 1).

The name’s association with the 5th century patron-saint of Ireland, Saint Patrick, may explain why the decline of its popularity has coincided with declining religiosity and shifting demographics in the United States. In 1976, 81% of Americans identified as white Christians, but by 2017 only 43% did so (Cox and Jones 2017). Weekly church attendance amongst Catholics decreased from 75% to 39% between 1955 and 2017 (Saad 2018). Amongst 20-29-year-old Catholics, church attendance has declined from 73% to 25% (Saad 2018). This may contribute to the declining selection of “Patrick”; decreasing religiosity likely lessens desire to name children after saints.

This trend seems also to have affected other religious names, such as those of the Apostles. (See Figure 2).

Certain religious names will likely continue to decline as American Christians become less numerous and less devout.

References

Cox, Daniel and Robert P. Jones. “America’s Changing Religious Identity”. Research. PRRI, September 6, 2017. https://www.prri.org/research/american-religious-landscape-christian-religiously-unaffiliated/.

Saad, Lydia. “Catholics’ Church Attendance Continues Downward Slide.” Politics. Gallup, April 9, 2018. https://news.gallup.com/poll/232226/church-attendance-among-catholics-resumes-downward-slide.aspx

Social Security Administratio

Filed Under: Teaching

History and Philosophy of Science Colloquium: Society and Information in Writing the History of Disease (Sumit Guha)

Professor Guha’s interest in disease history originated in his study of demography. He has published on disease mortality in Victorian England in “The Importance of Social Intervention in England’s Mortality Decline,” Social History of Medicine 7,1 (1994), 89-113. His earlier work on South Asia is compiled in Health and Population in South Asia (2001/2009).

This talk, “Society and Information in Writing the History of Disease,” draws on “India in the Pandemic Age,” recently published in Indian Economic Review (https://doi.org/10.1007/s41775-020-00088-0). The latter originated in a request from the Review to write a historical essay that would preface a more contemporary special issue of the journal. It was also written in a couple of weeks, when libraries were closed.

Addressing an audience of economists, the article tried to tease out the historical processes that produce the data series utilized by medicine and the sciences. Professor Guha will address some of these larger epistemological problems in his talk.
_______________
Sumit Guha holds the Frances Higginbotham Nalle Professorship in the UT History Department. He is the author of The Agrarian Economy of the Bombay Deccan 1818-1941 (1985), Environment and Ethnicity in India, c. 1200-1991 (1999), Health and Population in South Asia from earliest times to the present (2001), and Beyond Caste: Identity and Power in South Asia, Past and Present (2013). His most recent book, History and Collective Memory in South Asia,1200–2000, was published by University of Washington Press in 2019.

Other writings by Sumit Guha on Not Even Past

History Between Memory and Reconstruction

Did the British Empire depend on separating Parents and Children?


The views and opinions expressed in this article or video are those of the individual author(s) or presenter(s) and do not necessarily reflect the policy or views of the editors at Not Even Past, the UT Department of History, the University of Texas at Austin, or the UT System Board of Regents. Not Even Past is an online public history magazine rather than a peer-reviewed academic journal. While we make efforts to ensure that factual information in articles was obtained from reliable sources, Not Even Past is not responsible for any errors or omissions. 

Filed Under: Features

IHS Climate in Context Talk: Climate, Migration, and Plague in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire

We are currently experiencing one of the most disruptive pandemics in modern history. The COVID-19 pandemic came in the wake of a series of global ecological disturbances, climate fluctuations, uncontrolled urbanization, habitat destruction, decline in biological diversity, the sixth age of extinction, and the biggest human displacement in modern history. While policy makers seek to develop their predictions on the basis of “unprecedented” models, historians step in to remind them that historical precedents can help inform those models.

In this presentation, Professor Nükhet Varlık will address climate fluctuations, human migrations, and plague pandemics of the early modern era, with a view to exploring the connections between them. Geographically, she will mainly focus on Anatolia and the Balkans, but also try to establish connections with a larger area in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Temporally, she will survey outbreaks of plague from the mid-fourteenth century Black Death and its recurrent waves up to the eighteenth century. Her goal is to use the early modern Ottoman Empire as a case study to provide insights about the complex relationships between climate, migration, and plague—perennial problems of the past and present.

Nükhet Varlık (PhD, University of Chicago) is Associate Professor of History at Rutgers University – Newark and Associate Professor of History at the University of South Carolina. She is a historian of the Ottoman Empire interested in disease, medicine, and public health. Her first book, Plague and Empire in the Early Modern Mediterranean World: The Ottoman Experience, 1347–1600 (Cambridge University Press, 2015; paperback 2017; Turkish translation: Akdeniz Dünyasında ve Osmanlılarda Veba, 1347-1600 (2017)), is the first systematic scholarly study of the Ottoman experience of plague during the Black Death pandemic and the centuries that followed. It received the Middle East Studies Association’s 2016 Albert Hourani Book Award, the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association’s 2016 M. Fuat Köprülü Book Prize, the Society for the Medieval Mediterranean’s 2017 Dionysius A. Agius Prize, and the American Association for the History of Medicine’s 2018 George Rosen Prize. Her recently published edited volume, Plague and Contagion in the Islamic Mediterranean (Arc Humanities Press, 2017), is a collection of articles on the social, cultural, and political responses to epidemics in the post-Black Death Islamic Mediterranean. She has authored several articles and book chapters addressing different aspects of plague epidemics in Ottoman society and is currently working on a new book project titled, “Empire, Ecology, and Plague: Rethinking the Second Pandemic (ca.1340s-ca.1840s),” which examines the five-hundred-year Ottoman plague experience in a global ecological context. In conjunction with this research, she is translating and editing a number of sources pertaining to the history of Ottoman medicine, and is involved in multidisciplinary research projects that incorporate perspectives from molecular genetics (ancient DNA research in particular), bioarchaeology, disease ecology, and climate science into historical inquiry. She has previously taught at James Madison University and Rutgers University–Newark. Her research has been supported by the NEH, Koç University’s Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations, Turkish Cultural Foundation, and the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. She is the Editor of the Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association (JOTSA).

Read more about Dr. Varlık’s work on her faculty profile page and on her Academia page.

This talk is part of the Institute’s theme in 2020-2021 on “Climate in Context: Historical Precedents and the Unprecedented.”

Related Reading:

IHS Climate in Context – Lessons from the Plague: Looking to the Historical Record by Brittany Erwin

IHS Climate in Context: How Do Pandemics End? History Suggests Diseases Fade But Are Almost Never Truly Gone


The views and opinions expressed in this article or video are those of the individual author(s) or presenter(s) and do not necessarily reflect the policy or views of the editors at Not Even Past, the UT Department of History, the University of Texas at Austin, or the UT System Board of Regents. Not Even Past is an online public history magazine rather than a peer-reviewed academic journal. While we make efforts to ensure that factual information in articles was obtained from reliable sources, Not Even Past is not responsible for any errors or omissions.

Filed Under: Climate in Context, Watch & Listen

Protected: FRAGMENTS2020: LIVING HISTORY

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Filed Under: Uncategorized

IHS Climate in Context: Lessons from the Plague: Looking to the Historical Record

On October 22nd at 3:30 pm CDT, historian and specialist in disease, medicine, and public health Nükhet Varlık will present her work at the Institute for Historical Studies. Dr. Varlik is an Associate Professor of History at Rutgers University-Newark and an Associate Professor of History at the University of South Carolina. Her IHS talk will discuss “Climate, Migration, and Plague in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire.” It reflects Dr. Varlik’s extensive research into epidemics throughout world history.

One of Dr. Varlik’s recent publications, entitled “Rethinking the history of plague in the time of COVID-19,” is especially timely. The article explores the history of social and medical responses to plague in the Afro-Eurasian world. She argues that it is important to “take stock of the lasting legacies of past plagues because they continue to shape the way we think about—and therefore act against—new pandemics.”

The article explains that “studying infection and gaining insights into the dynamic interplay between a new pathogen and a population encountering it” is especially useful “as we contemplate the idea of learning to adapt to [the] new disease regime” that COVID-19 “imposes on our contemporary world.”

Dr Varlik’s first book

Using the example of the Plague of Marseille of 1720–1721, Dr. Varlik describes the ways that “living with the plague,” and fear of future infection, “became a fact of life” for the affected societies. On the local, regional, and imperial levels, officials established “border controls, quarantines, and isolation stations” to contain the spread. In the aftermath of the outbreak, doctors and government officers looked to those efforts as the model response.

However, the scholars and ruling states who looked back at that model also pushed the notion that “the Orient (and Oriental bodies)” were “site[s] of sickness.” The prevailing origin story among authorities in Marseille was that the plague had entered their port from ships in contact with the Ottoman Empire. Dr. Varlik argues that this idea continues to influence discussions of disease and migration today, creating “harmful” and “toxic” narratives. They are also incomplete and oversimplified explanations of the complex development of plague outbreaks.

The objective of this publication is to urge a reconceptualization of the study of disease by recognizing the ways that older understandings continue to influence contemporary action. As Dr. Varlik writes, “only by shifting the methodological lens to a dynamic multispecies one, by distributing agency also to rodents, fleas, and the bacterium itself—and not only to human efforts to control disease— can we fully comprehend disease ecologies in their social, climatic, and environmental contexts.”

In summary, this article offers an important reminder: “It is not only that the past helps us to understand the present; the present should help us to rethink the past.”

The article, “Rethinking the history of plague in the time of COVID-19,” was originally published in Centaurus Volume 62 Issue 2 in May of 2020. See the Centaurus website and the article here.

See also “The plague that never left: restoring the Second Pandemic to Ottoman and Turkish history in the time of COVID-19,” New Perspectives on Turkey 63 (2020): 1-14; open access: https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2020.27 

To hear more from Dr. Varlik, please join her IHS talk, which will take place on zoom. Register here

For more events related to climate and environmental history at the Institute, see the calendar


The views and opinions expressed in this article or video are those of the individual author(s) or presenter(s) and do not necessarily reflect the policy or views of the editors at Not Even Past, the UT Department of History, the University of Texas at Austin, or the UT System Board of Regents. Not Even Past is an online public history magazine rather than a peer-reviewed academic journal. While we make efforts to ensure that factual information in articles was obtained from reliable sources, Not Even Past is not responsible for any errors or omissions.

Filed Under: Climate in Context, Environment, Features, Ideas/Intellectual History, Politics, Science/Medicine/Technology, Transnational

Vanguard: How Black Women Broke Barriers, Won the Vote, and Insisted on Equality for All by Martha S. Jones (2020)

by Tiana Wilson

As we rapidly approach the 2020 US presidential election, Kamala Harris’ acceptance of the Democratic party’s nomination for Vice President offers great hope to a variety of marginalized communities who have been historically underrepresented in the national political arena. Harris, who identifies as a Black woman, is the daughter of Indian and Jamaican immigrants. Her initial presidential campaign and then her announcement as Vice President led different media outlets to portray her as the first Black woman and first candidate of Indian descent to be named on a major U.S. party’s ticket. Yet, this narrative is not complete and it obscures the great strides made by Black women that paved the way for Harris. Nearly five decades ago, in 1972, Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm became the first Black woman to seek a major party’s nomination for the US presidency. For anyone interested in contextualizing the current political climate, historian Martha S. Jones’ most recent work, Vanguard: How Black Women Broke Barriers, Won the Vote, and Insisted on Equality for All (2020), is a must read. She provides us with a sweeping narrative of how Black women struggled for political power and how this galvanized a broader movement for human rights.

Tracing over two hundred years of political work, Jones foregrounds the different modes and strategies Black women took to not only actively participate in democracy, but also to confront racism and sexism in society. She argues that referring to Black women as the “vanguard” has a double meaning. On the one hand, Black women were the nation’s original feminists and anti-racists, emerging from brutal encounters with enslavement, sexual violence, and economic exploitation. At the same time, Black women pointed the US toward its “best ideals…realizing the equality and dignity of all persons” (11). Drawing on newspapers, books, court transcripts, speeches, letters, and memoirs, Jones raises up the voices of Black women and shows how their dreams of liberation were very different from those put forward by white women. Although winning the right to vote was one goal, Black women never limited their efforts to a single issue. Instead, Black women worked to secure civil rights, prison reform, juvenile justice, and international human rights. As Vanguard demonstrates, examining the long political history of Black women shifts the periodization of the larger women’s rights movement, reminds us the important role race played in women’s political goals, and disrupts our ideas of where political activity occurs.

As we continue to celebrate the centennial of the Nineteenth Amendment, Jones reminds us that the fight for women’s suffrage did not begin with Seneca Falls in 1848 neither did it end in 1920. Instead, readers are provided with a comprehensive narrative of the different tactics Black women utilized to obtain civil rights not just for themselves, but for other groups as well.

The first three chapters of Vanguard explores Black women’s political activism from the American Revolution era to the end of the Civil War. Jones begins the narrative in the late 1780s, because she argues the American Revolution ushered in an antislavery movement in the US and therefore offered Black women the opportunity to participate in this new public culture. In these early chapters, Jones introduces us to women like Jarena Lee, Maria Stewart, and Sarah Mapps Douglass who moved freely in the urban North and used their writings to denounce slavery, call other women to participate in politics outside of the domestic sphere, and challenge Black male dominance in religious environments. During this era, antislavery societies, benevolent associations, and literary clubs became new forums where Black women publicly gathered to discuss abolitionism and women’s rights. In this section, we also learn that although Black women linked arms across the color line, they were not in attendance at the infamous 1848 Seneca Falls Convention. Jones claims this was largely due to Black women’s commitment to antiracism and obtaining civil rights as a unified movement with Black men. However, in these predominately Black spaces, which were often times church conferences, Black women demanded equal treatment alongside their male counterparts.

Banner with motto of the National Association of Colored Women's Clubs, "Lift As We Climb." Collection of the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture

When the Civil War ended and Congress passed the Thirteenth Amendment, the nation underwent tremendous social, political, and economic changes. Although the fight for Black equality and women’s suffrage accelerated, Black women felt excluded from these larger conversations, which influenced them to establish their own organizations. The next three chapters of Vanguard discusses the emergence of a Black woman’s movement from the Reconstruction era to the end of the first World War. Black women chose not to join the two new national women’s suffrage organizations, the American Woman Suffrage Association and the National Woman Suffrage Association, because these groups were dominated by white women who upheld racism and suffrage alone was too narrow of an agenda for Black women. In these sections, Jones examines the leading Black women thinkers of this era, Black clubwomen and churchwomen, largely due to their ability to speak on civil rights and church politics in public arenas. For example, the National Association of Colored Women (NACW) coalesced under the motto “Lifting as we climb,” which implied that clubwomen were on the rise to racial progress, and they intended to help other Black women along the way (153). NACW’s first president Mary  Church Terrell revealed the particular struggles of Black American women in 1904 when she traveled to Europe to give a speech at the World’s Conference of Women. As Jones points out, sometimes Black clubwomen held opposing ideas where some argued for women to have the right to be mothers and homemakers and others privileged suffrage.

Black women suffragists holding sign reading "Head-Quarters for Colored Women Voters," in Georgia, Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture, Photographs and Prints Division, Courtesy of New York Public Library Digital Collections

The ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920 did little to change the everyday political realities for Black women. Jim Crow still dominated the South, and some Black women lost faith in obtaining voting rights and opted to put their efforts in Black Nationalist organizations like the United Negro Improvement Association (UNIA). Despite such discouragement, other Black women continued the fight and the last three chapters of Vanguard focuses on these women who worked tirelessly for the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which banned state and local governments from denying citizens equal voting rights based on race or color. The final section explores figures like Mary McLeod Bethune who worked with the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration, Fannie Lou Hamer who founded the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party (MFDP), and Rosa Parks who was in attendance at Lyndon B. Johnson’s final details ceremony for the Voting Rights Act.      

National Association of Colored Women Program, 1962. Mary Church Terrell Papers: Subject File, 1884-1962; National Association of Colored Women, 1897-1962; Miscellaneous; Undated, Library of Congress

As we continue to celebrate the centennial of the Nineteenth Amendment, Jones reminds us that the fight for women’s suffrage did not begin with Seneca Falls in 1848 neither did it end in 1920. Instead, readers are provided with a comprehensive narrative of the different tactics Black women utilized to obtain civil rights not just for themselves, but for other groups as well. The strength of this book lies in Jones’ ability to capture Black women’s diverse ideas that were simultaneously moderate and radical. Black women were not and are not a homogeneous group, and the history of our political work further illustrates this point. Vanguard is the ideal text for an undergraduate course or graduate seminar that covers US History topics like African American History, Women’s Liberation Movement, and Public Policy. I highly recommend it.  

Filed Under: 1800s, 1900s, Atlantic World, Biography, Education, Ideas/Intellectual History, Periods, Politics, Race/Ethnicity, Regions, Reviews, Topics, United States, Work/Labor, Writers/Literature

IHS Book Talk: A Nation of Immigrants Reconsidered: U.S. Society in an Age of Restriction, 1924-1965

The History Faculty New Book Series presents:

A Nation of Immigrants Reconsidered: U.S. Society in an Age of Restriction, 1924-1965
(University of Illinois Press, 2019)
Co-edited by Maddalena Marinari, Madeline Y. Hsu, and María Cristina Garcia

A book talk and discussion with

Dr. Madeline Y. Hsu
Professor of History, and 
Faculty Affiliate of Asian American Studies, Asian Studies, and Mexican American and Latina_o Studies
University of Texas at Austin
https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/history/faculty/myh95

Dr. Maddalena Marinari

Associate Professor in History; Peace Studies; and
Gender, Women and Sexuality Studies
Gustavus Adolphus College
https://gustavus.edu/profiles/mmarinar

This talk took place on Wednesday October 14, 2020

Scholars, journalists, and policymakers have long argued that the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act dramatically reshaped the demographic composition of the United States. In A Nation of Immigrants Reconsidered, leading scholars of immigration explore how the political and ideological struggles of the “age of restriction”–from 1924 to 1965–paved the way for the changes to come. The essays examine how geopolitics, civil rights, perceptions of America’s role as a humanitarian sanctuary, and economic priorities led government officials to facilitate the entrance of specific immigrant groups, thereby establishing the legal precedents for future policies. Eye-opening articles discuss Japanese war brides and changing views of miscegenation, the recruitment of former Nazi scientists, a temporary workers program with Japanese immigrants, the emotional separation of Mexican immigrant families, Puerto Rican youth’s efforts to claim an American identity, and the restaurant raids of conscripted Chinese sailors during World War II.

Contributors: Eiichiro Azuma, David Cook-Martín, David FitzGerald, Monique Laney, Heather Lee, Kathleen López, Laura Madokoro, Ronald L. Mize, Arissa H. Oh, Ana Elizabeth Rosas, Lorrin Thomas, Ruth Ellen Wasem, and Elliott Young.

“This important collection revises our understanding of a relatively understudied period in the historiography of US immigration and citizenship, the years between the institution of national origins quotas in the 1920s and their abrogation in the 1960s. As such, it deserves wide scholarly attention.”
–Kunal M. Parker, author of Making Foreigners: Immigration and Citizenship Law in America, 1600–2000

“Bringing together essays by rising stars and established leaders in US immigration history, this volume opens our understanding of the complexities of the national origins era by highlighting understudied dynamics, advancing new periodizations, and bringing new historical actors to the fore. Taken as a whole, the essays insist on the centrality of racial-nationalist boundary-making—and of struggles to defeat it—within the broader history of the US in the world in the mid-twentieth century.”
–Paul A. Kramer, author of The Blood of Government: Race, Empire, the United States, and the Philippines

Speakers:

Dr. Madeline Y. Hsu is Professor of History at the University of Texas at Austin and served as Director of the Center for Asian American Studies for eight years (2006-2014).  She is president of the Immigration and Ethnic History Society and representative at large of the International Society for the Study of Chinese Overseas.  She was born in Columbia, Missouri but grew up in Taiwan and Hong Kong between visits with her grandparents at their store in Altheimer, Arkansas.  She received her undergraduate degrees in History from Pomona College and PhD from Yale University.  Her first book was Dreaming of Gold, Dreaming of Home: Transnationalism and Migration between the United States and South China, 1882-1943 (Stanford University Press, 2000).  Her most recent monograph, The Good Immigrants: How the Yellow Peril Became the Model Minority (Princeton University Press, 2015), received awards from the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations, the Immigration and Ethnic History Society, the Asian Pacific American Librarians Association, and the Association for Asian American Studies.  Her third book, Asian American History: A Very Short Introduction was published by Oxford University Press in 2016 and the co-edited anthology under discussion at this event, A Nation of Immigrants Reconsidered: U.S. Society in an Age of Restriction, 1924-1965 was published in 2019 by the University of Illinois Press.

Dr. Maddalena Marinari is Associate Professor of History at Gustavus Adolphus College. She has written extensively on immigration restriction, U.S. immigration policy, and immigrant mobilization. Her work has appeared in the Journal of Policy History, Journal of Gilded Age and Progressive Era, Social Science History, and Journal of American Ethnic History. Her book Unwanted: Italian And Jewish Mobilization Against Restrictive Immigration Laws, 1882-1965 (UNC Press 2020) explores Italian and Jewish mobilization against restrictive immigration laws from 1882 to 1965. Along with Maria Cristina Garcia and Madeline Hsu, she is one of the editors of  i, an anthology on the impact of immigration restriction on the United States in the twentieth century. She is the co-editor with Erika Lee of a forthcoming special issue of the Journal of American History on the centenary of the passage of the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and the Immigration Act of 1924

Watch a roundtable discussion with the authors on “Rethinking 1924–1965 in U.S. Immigration History for Today’s World,” recorded at the Organization of American Historians annual conference, April 5-7, 2019, and aired on C-SPAN 3, on April 22, 2019.

This event was sponsored by the Institute for Historical Studies in the Department of History and the Center for European Studies.

The views and opinions expressed in this article or video are those of the individual author(s) or presenter(s) and do not necessarily reflect the policy or views of the editors at Not Even Past, the UT Department of History, the University of Texas at Austin, or the UT System Board of Regents. Not Even Past is an online public history magazine rather than a peer-reviewed academic journal. While we make efforts to ensure that factual information in articles was obtained from reliable sources, Not Even Past is not responsible for any errors or omissions.

Filed Under: Institute for Historical Studies, Watch & Listen

IHS Book Talk: The Lives of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr.

The History Faculty New Book Series presents:

The Sword and the Shield: The Revolutionary Lives of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr.
(Basic Books, 2020)

A book talk and discussion with:

Peniel E. Joseph
Barbara Jordan Chair in Ethics and Political Values, LBJ School of Public Affairs, Professor of History, and Founding Director Center for the Study of Race and Democracy, The University of Texas at Austin
https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/history/faculty/pej335

This talk took place on September 17, 2020.

>

This dual biography of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King upends longstanding preconceptions to transform our understanding of the twentieth century’s most iconic African American leaders.

To most Americans, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. represent contrasting ideals: self-defense vs. nonviolence, black power vs. civil rights, the sword vs. the shield. The struggle for black freedom is wrought with the same contrasts. While nonviolent direct action is remembered as an unassailable part of American democracy, the movement’s militancy is either vilified or erased outright. In The Sword and the Shield, Peniel E. Joseph upends these misconceptions and reveals a nuanced portrait of two men who, despite markedly different backgrounds, inspired and pushed each other throughout their adult lives. This is a strikingly revisionist biography, not only of Malcolm and Martin, but also of the movement and era they came to define.

“Mr. Joseph, a history professor at the University of Texas at Austin, weaves [Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X’s] stories fluidly and with vivid detail, helping to strip away the high gloss of mythology.”
—Wall Street Journal

“Joseph’s fresh and perceptive dual biography may rekindle political unity in a time of increasingly granular identity politics, sensationalism, and fear.”
—Booklist

“It is a fascinating story, full of subtle twists and turns.”—Washington Post    
“As the author delineates the philosophies and tactics of each man, he compares and contrasts them on nearly every page, making the various narrative strands cohere nicely. An authoritative dual biography from a leading scholar of African American history.”
—Kirkus

Peniel Joseph holds a joint professorship appointment at the LBJ School of Public Affairs and the History Department in the College of Liberal Arts at The University of Texas at Austin. He is also the founding director of the LBJ School’s Center for the Study of Race and Democracy (CSRD). His career focus has been on “Black Power Studies,” which encompasses interdisciplinary fields such as Africana studies, law and society, women’s and ethnic studies, and political science.

Prior to joining the UT faculty, Dr. Joseph was a professor at Tufts University, where he founded the school’s Center for the Study of Race and Democracy to promote engaged research and scholarship focused on the ways issues of race and democracy affect people’s lives.

In addition to being a frequent commentator on issues of race, democracy and civil rights, Dr. Joseph’s most recent book is The Sword and the Shield: The Revolutionary Lives of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr.. He also wrote the award-winning books Waiting ‘Til the Midnight Hour: A Narrative History of Black Power in America and Dark Days, Bright Nights: From Black Power to Barack Obama. His book Stokely: A Life has been called the definitive biography of Stokely Carmichael, the man who popularized the phrase “black power.” Included among Joseph’s other book credits is the editing of The Black Power Movement: Rethinking the Civil Rights-Black Power Era and Neighborhood Rebels: Black Power at the Local Level.

More from Dr. Joseph on Not Even Past

  • Stokely Carmichael: A Life
  • Muhammad Ali helped make black power into a global brand
  • 15 Minute History Episode 90: Stokely Carmichael: A Life
  • Watch: “The Confederate Statues at UT”
  • The Sword and the Shield – A Conversation with Peniel E. Joseph (Part I)
  • The Sword and The Shield – A Conversation with Peniel E. Joseph (Part II)

The views and opinions expressed in this article or video are those of the individual author(s) or presenter(s) and do not necessarily reflect the policy or views of the editors at Not Even Past, the UT Department of History, the University of Texas at Austin, or the UT System Board of Regents. Not Even Past is an online public history magazine rather than a peer-reviewed academic journal. While we make efforts to ensure that factual information in articles was obtained from reliable sources, Not Even Past is not responsible for any errors or omissions.

Filed Under: Watch & Listen

IHS Climate in Context Talk: Lessons From Little Ice Ages? Resilience and Complexity in Societal Responses to Climate Change

In September 2020, Dr Dagomar Degroot of Georgetown University delivered a talk as part of the Institute for Historical Studies 2020-21 Climate in Context theme. The abstract of the talk was as follows:

Although the speed, scale, and human origin of present-day global warming has no historical parallel, many societies of the past endured profound changes in regional climate. A large and growing scholarship now finds that these natural changes provoked food shortages that plunged civilizations into crisis – or even caused them to collapse. Yet in recent years, historians and archaeologists have found that social responses to past climate change were more complex and more varied than scholars have previously imagined. This talk will introduce new research on the resilience of societies to two periods of climatic cooling – the “Late Antique Little Ice Age” of the sixth century CE and the “Little Ice Age” of the thirteenth to nineteenth centuries – before considering whether the distant past can tell us anything about the uncertain future.

Dagomar Degroot is Associate Professor of History at Georgetown University, and an environmental historian who bridges the humanities and sciences to explore how societies have thrived – or suffered – in the face of dramatic changes in the natural world. His first book, The Frigid Golden Age: Climate Change, the Little Ice Age, and the Dutch Republic, 1560-1720 (Cambridge University Press) explains how one society – the Dutch Republic – prospered as many others faltered when volcanic eruptions changed Earth’s climate in the seventeenth century. His second book, “Ripples on the Cosmic Ocean: An Environmental History of Humanity’s Place in the Solar System” (under contract with Harvard University Press/Penguin Random House), argues that dynamic environments across the solar system have played a bigger role in human history than previously imagined. Read more about Dr. Degroot’s work on his professional homepage.

This talk is part of the Institute’s 2020-2021 theme, “Climate in Context: Historical Precedents and the Unprecedented.”

Sponsored by: Institute for Historical Studies in the Department of History, Planet Texas 2050, and Center for European Studies

Further reading:

“IHS Climate in Context: Understanding Resilience in the History of Climate Change” by Dagomar Degroot

Exploring Scholarship on the Little Ice Age by Raymond Hyser

Tools and Resources for Studying Environmental History by Brittany Erwin


The views and opinions expressed in this article or video are those of the individual author(s) or presenter(s) and do not necessarily reflect the policy or views of the editors at Not Even Past, the UT Department of History, the University of Texas at Austin, or the UT System Board of Regents. Not Even Past is an online public history magazine rather than a peer-reviewed academic journal. While we make efforts to ensure that factual information in articles was obtained from reliable sources, Not Even Past is not responsible for any errors or omissions.

Filed Under: Climate in Context, Institute for Historical Studies, Watch & Listen

This is Democracy – From Churchill and Roosevelt to Trump and Brexit: What Have We Learned?

Guest: Ian Buruma is a leading writer about recent history, politics, human rights, democracy, and international affairs. He is a prolific author of major books, including, among many others: Year Zero; Occidentalism; and The Wages of Guilt. Ian’s most recent book is: The Churchill Complex: The Curse of Being Special, From Winston and FDR to Trump and Brexit

On this episode, Ian Buruma discusses the lasting legacy of Winston Churchill as it relates to our current political climate.

To set the scene, Zachary reads his poem entitled, “The Greeks have Seceded from the Continent.”

About This is Democracy

The future of democracy is uncertain, but we are committed to its urgent renewal today. This podcast will draw on historical knowledge to inspire a contemporary democratic renaissance. The past offers hope for the present and the future, if only we can escape the negativity of our current moment — and each show will offer a serious way to do that! This podcast will bring together thoughtful voices from different generations to help make sense of current challenges and propose positive steps forward. Our goal is to advance democratic change, one show at a time. Dr. Jeremi Suri, a renowned scholar of democracy, will host the podcast and moderate discussions.

Filed Under: Watch & Listen

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Recent Posts

  • This is Democracy – Iran-Contra and its Legacies
  • NEP’s Archive Chronicles – Full Series
  • This is Democracy – Free Speech and Repression in Turkey
  • This is Democracy – Israel-Palestine
  • This is Democracy – Broadcasting Democracy
NOT EVEN PAST is produced by

The Department of History

The University of Texas at Austin

We are supported by the College of Liberal Arts
And our Readers

Donate
Contact

All content © 2010-present NOT EVEN PAST and the authors, unless otherwise noted

Sign up to receive our MONTHLY NEWSLETTER

  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Teaching
  • Watch & Listen
  • About